Now that we have an idea of how to construct sentences, we can begin by deciding what is important (to be stressed), less important (to be subordinated), and not important (to be omitted). Next, take the reader’s expectations into account, by considering the position of each word. The following table describes the most important positions in a sentence in line with reader expectations.
| Start |
End |
| Old information |
New information |
| Familiar |
Complex |
| Short |
Long |
The following sentences contain the same facts, but differ in focus. Due to this, they have to be written in either an active or a passive voice. Here, the choice, i.e. the word order, is determined by context, not by convention to use only one voice and not the other.
In the active voice, the subject performs the action. The subject is sand flies, the verb is carry, and the object is Leishmania parasites. Our attention is on sand flies. The sentence emphasises that they carry Leishmania parasites (as distinct from carrying e.g. microsporidia). We would use this sentence if the previous discussion was about sand flies.
Active voice
👍 Sand flies carry Leishmania parasites.
In the passive voice, the subject receives the action. The subject is Leishmania parasites, the verb phrase is are carried by, and the object is sand flies. Our attention is on the Leishmania parasites. The sentence emphasises that they are carried by sand flies (as distinct from being carried by e.g. fleas). We would use this sentence if the previous discussion was about Leishmania parasites.
Passive voice
👍 Leishmania parasites are carried by sand flies.
Use the Active and Passive Voices Appropriately
Aside from allowing word order to dictate active versus passive voice, there are specific cases when we want to use one versus the other.
Use the active voice to claim ownership
Remember, in an active voice sentence, the subject performs the action. The active voice states who or what performed an action. In a passive voice sentence, the subject receives the action.
👎 Considering the robust enrichment for metabolic kinases, a substantial reprogramming of metabolism upon macrophage activation was hypothesized.
👍 Considering the robust enrichment for metabolic kinases we hypothesized a substantial reprogramming of metabolism upon macrophage activation.
👎 It was hypothesized that the changes in profiles of fatty acids may serve as a mechanism for improved cognition.
👍 We hypothesized that the changes in profiles of fatty acids may serve as a mechanism for improved cognition.
Some advantages of the active voice, which is gaining in popularity in scientific literature:
- Avoids false modesty
- Projects enthusiasm
- Enlivens your writing
- Allows you to claim ownership of results
Don’t be afraid to state the agent of an action even if it is I or we when appropriate. However, when using the active voice, the agent is not always human, as shown in the following examples.
The Active and Passive Voices
In an active voice sentence, the subject performs the action. In a passive voice sentence, the subject receives the action.
👍 Macrophages generate nitric oxide metabolites during the immune response. Active voice
👍 Nitric oxide metabolites are generated by macrophages during the immune response. Passive voice
In the Results section, first person pronouns (I and we) can be used with verbs in the active voice to take ownership of a result.
Use Active Voice when Reporting Results
In these sentences from a Results section, the active voice is more effective.
👎 Isolated mitochondria were assayed for nitric oxide synthase activity. Passive voice
👍 We assayed isolated mitochondria for nitric oxide synthase activity. Active voice
We already saw that the choice of word location and placement in a paper can determine the choice of active or passive voice. Another consideration is style, changing the voice of a sentence can make it more concise and readable.
Active Versus Passive Voice Determined by Style
This sentence comes from a Results section, in which the active voice is often preferable. The passive form is not only longer, but also contains a buried verb. Can you find it?
👎 The action potential of ventricular myocardial fibres was determined by direct measurement.Passive voice
👍 We directly measured the action potential of ventricular myocardial fibres. Active voice
The passive voice allows the author to distance himself from his own work, thus facilitating an unbiased viewpoint. However, excessive use of the passive voice leads to dull and dense writing. It can be used effectively in certain situations as shown in the margin note.
Some advantages of the passive voice include:
- Author remains anonymous
- More objectivity and modesty
- Shorten subject length
Note that the passive voice is appropriate in the Materials & Methods section. This is useful if the work described was performed by technicians or third party service providers who are not authors. Moreover, using the passive voice in the Materials & Methods section focuses the action on the topic of interest.
Use Passive Voice when Reporting Materials & Methods
In this sentence from a Materials & Methods section, the topic is cells. Using the passive voice emphasises the specific topic.
👎 We incubated the cells at room temperature for two days.Active voice
👍 The cells were incubated at room temperature for two days. Passive voice
Passive versus Active Voice
Complete the following three tasks for each of the sentences below:
Identify if it is written in the active or passive voice
Consider if this sentence should be re-written in the other voice. Why or why not?
Think about where this sentence would appear in a research article. What purpose does it serve?
If you think it should be re-written, do so in the space provided.
Betaine was administered to rats orally through a syringe fitted with a ball-type feeding needle in a volume of 0.2 ml per rat per feeding.
When lithium was administered to rats prior to sacrifice, renal GSH level, but not hepatic GSH level, was increased significantly.
Barnett, Adrian, and Nicole White. 2024.
“Something is off-base with this title: P esteems, statical significance and more slapdash stats.” Significance 21 (1): 11–13.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jrssig/qmae007.
Berger, J. 2008.
Ways of Seeing. Penguin Modern Classics. Penguin Books Limited.
https://books.google.de/books?id=QxdperNq5R8C.
Berne, E. 2011.
Games People Play: The Basic Handbook of Transactional Analysis. Tantor Media, Incorporated.
https://books.google.de/books?id=D9dOBAAAQBAJ.
Bilz, S., R. Klanten, and M. Mischler. 2011.
The Little Know-It-All: Common Sense for Designers. Gestalten.
https://books.google.de/books?id=JA8FfAEACAAJ.
Bjork, Robert A, and Elizabeth L Bjork. 2011. “Making Things Hard on Yourself, but in a Good Way: Creating Desirable Difficulties to Enhance Learning.” In Psychology and the Real World: Essays Illustrating Fundamental Contributions to Society, edited by Morton A Gernsbacher, Robert W Pew, Leah M Hough, and James R Pomerantz, 56–64. Worth Publishers.
Bloom, P. 2016.
Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion. HarperCollins.
https://books.google.de/books?id=op67CwAAQBAJ.
Bringhurst, R. 2004.
The Elements of Typographic Style. Elements of Typographic Style. Hartley & Marks, Publishers.
https://books.google.de/books?id=940sAAAAYAAJ.
Briscoe, M. H. 2012.
Preparing Scientific Illustrations: A Guide to Better Posters, Presentations, and Publications. Springer New York.
https://books.google.de/books?id=mYTlBwAAQBAJ.
Cepeda, Nicholas J, Harold Pashler, Edward Vul, John T Wixted, and Doug Rohrer. 2006. “Distributed Practice in Verbal Recall Tasks: A Review and Quantitative Synthesis.” Psychological Bulletin 132 (3): 354–80.
Chasson, Gregory, and Sara R. Jarosiewicz. 2014.
“Social Competence Impairments in Autism Spectrum Disorders.” In
Comprehensive Guide to Autism, edited by Vinood B. Patel, Victor R. Preedy, and Colin R. Martin, 1099–1118. New York, NY: Springer New York.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4788-7_60.
Cheeseman, Ian H., Natalia Gomez-Escobar, Celine K. Carret, Alasdair Ivens, Lindsay B. Stewart, Kevin KA Tetteh, and David J. Conway. 2009.
“Gene Copy Number Variation Throughout the Plasmodium Falciparum Genome.” BMC Genomics 10 (1): 353.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-353.
Cherry, C. 1980.
On Human Communication: A Review, a Survey, and a Criticism. MIT Press Classics. MIT Press.
https://books.google.de/books?id=kQwqSwAACAAJ.
Daston, L., and P. Galison. 2007. Objectivity. Book Collections on Project MUSE. Zone Books.
Diemand-Yauman, Connor, Daniel M Oppenheimer, and Erikka B Vaughan. 2011. “Fortune Favors the Bold (and the Italicized): Effects of Disfluency on Educational Outcomes.” Cognition.
Hamming, R., and B. Victor. 2020. The Art of Doing Science and Engineering: Learning to Learn. Stripe Matter Incorporated.
Hench, Virginia K., and Lishan Su. 2011.
“Regulation of IL-2 Gene Expression by Siva and FOXP3 in Human t Cells.” BMC Immunology 12 (1): 54.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2172-12-54.
Hill, Jennifer, and Maria Singer. 2014.
“A Comparison of Print and Digital Reading Comprehension by Middle School Students.” Reading Research Quarterly 49 (2): 185–203.
https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.68.
Hofmann, A. H. 2020.
Scientific Writing and Communication: Papers, Proposals, and Presentations. Oxford University Press.
https://books.google.de/books?id=vQXuxAEACAAJ.
Jeffares, A. N., and M. B. Davies. 1958.
The Scientific Background: A Prose Anthology. Pitman.
https://books.google.de/books?id=F_gLAQAAIAAJ.
Kahneman, D. 2011.
Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus; Giroux.
https://books.google.com.ec/books?id=ZuKTvERuPG8C.
Lupton, E. 2010.
Thinking with Type, 2nd Revised and Expanded Edition: A Critical Guide for Designers, Writers, Editors, & Students. Princeton Architectural Press.
https://books.google.de/books?id=Y_NVRQAACAAJ.
Mangen, Anne, and Don Kuiken. 2014.
“Lost in an iPad: Narrative Engagement on Paper and Tablet.” Scientific Study of Literature 4 (2): 150–77.
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.4.2.01man.
Mangen, Anne, Bente R Walgermo, and Kolbjørn Brønnick. 2013.
“Reading Linear Texts on Paper Versus Computer Screen: Effects on Reading Comprehension.” International Journal of Educational Research 58: 61–68.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.002.
Margolin, Sara J, Christine Driscoll, Michael J Toland, and Jessica L Kegler. 2013.
“E-Readers, Computer Screens, or Paper: Does Reading Comprehension Change Across Media Platforms?” Applied Cognitive Psychology 27 (4): 512–19.
https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2930.
Murayama, Hiroshi, Yusuke Takagi, Hirokazu Tsuda, and Yuri Kato. 2023.
“Applying Nudge to Public Health Policy: Practical Examples and Tips for Designing Nudge Interventions.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. MDPI.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20053962.
producer, Stephen Lambert ;. written executive, and produced by Adam Curtis ;. RDF Television; BBC. [2009?].
“The Century of the Self.” Standard format. Wyandotte, MI : BigD Productions, [2009?].
https://search.library.wisc.edu/catalog/9910135083802121.
Roediger, Henry L, and Jeffrey D Karpicke. 2006. “Test-Enhanced Learning: Taking Memory Tests Improves Long-Term Retention.” Psychological Science 17 (3): 249–55.
Rohrer, Doug, and Kelli Taylor. 2007. “The Shuffling of Mathematics Problems Improves Learning.” Instructional Science 35 (6): 481–98.
Roman, K., and J. Raphaelson. 2010.
Writing That Works, 3rd Edition: How to Communicate Effectively in Business. HarperCollins.
https://books.google.de/books?id=3Rcv5CmGYf0C.
Roßa, N. 2017. Sketchnotes: Visuelle Notizen für Alles. frechverlag.
———. 2020. Sketchnotes: Die Große Symbol-Bibliothek. frechverlag.
Rousselet, Guillaume A, John J Foxe, and J Paul Bolam. 2016. “A Few Simple Steps to Improve the Description of Group Results in Neuroscience.” Eur. J. Neurosci. 44 (9): 2647–51.
Sanges, Remo, Yavor Hadzhiev, Marion Gueroult-Bellone, Agnes Roure, Marco Ferg, Nicola Meola, Gabriele Amore, et al. 2013.
“Highly conserved elements discovered in vertebrates are present in non-syntenic loci of tunicates, act as enhancers and can be transcribed during development.” Nucleic Acids Research 41 (6): 3600–3618.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt030.
Shannon, Claude Elwood. 1948.
“A Mathematical Theory of Communication.” The Bell System Technical Journal 27: 379–423.
http://plan9.bell-labs.com/cm/ms/what/shannonday/shannon1948.pdf.
Singer, Leona M, Patricia A Alexander, and Deborah D Reese. 2014.
“Reading on Paper and Digitally: What the Past Decades of Empirical Research Reveal.” Review of Educational Research 84 (4): 509–45.
https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314541101.
Slamecka, Norman J, and Peter Graf. 1978. “The Generation Effect: Delineation of a Phenomenon.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 4 (6): 592–604.
“Status of Mind - social media and young people’s mental health and wellbeing.” 2017. Royal Society for Public Health.
Steed, S., and an O’Reilly Media Company Safari. 2019.
Empathy at Work. O’Reilly Media.
https://books.google.de/books?id=U-j8xAEACAAJ.
Wästlund, Erik, Lars Nilsson, and Kenneth Holmqvist. 2012. “Eye Movement Patterns and Reading Processes in Eye-Friendly and Non-Eye-Friendly Typography.” Information Design Journal 19 (2): 119–32.
Weschler, L. 2006.
Everything That Rises: A Book of Convergences. McSweeney’s Books.
https://books.google.de/books?id=dqefAAAAMAAJ.
Zinsser, W. 2012.
On Writing Well, 30th Anniversary Edition: An Informal Guide to Writing Nonfiction. HarperCollins.
https://books.google.de/books?id=mp16BDRDaYQC.