Data visualization is probably the visual mode that comes to mind first for most scientists, so it’s surprising how little emphasis is placed on appreciating the connection it serves between a strong understanding of the underlying data and design elements of a suitable visualization. This is perhaps due to the persistent difficulty in producing elegant and appropriate visualizations, despite the dramatic reduction in complexity observed over the past 10 years and the explosion of tools available. In the following chapters we’ll take a look at both the data and the design elements and how they fit together.
Data visualizations also suffer from two seemingly contradictory yet inter-connected problems that plague much communication in STEM fields.
First, STEMians are surprisingly gullible when presented with flashy, exciting, colorful, shiny, new, sexy media. We are easily taken in by interactive plots, which may not serve any purpose, and perhaps unsurprisingly we also beautiful things, which can unfortunately distract from a critical assessment of the actual information presented.
Second, STEMians are biased to favor overly-complex, dry, difficult visualizations that also fail to serve a purpose in communication. This mirrors biases we see when presented with writing or with scientific presentations. I can’t recall how many students insist on making heatmaps althogh the data can more easily and clearly be presented with a differnt geometry, or how eager students are to generate and see box plots and, recently, violin plots, without knowing what thos plots actually show, nor if they actually represent the data properly.
With these biases in mind, let us first discuss the purposes in data visualization, which also mirror purposes in other modes of communication discussed in this book.
Barnett, Adrian, and Nicole White. 2024.
“Something is off-base with this title: P esteems, statical significance and more slapdash stats.” Significance 21 (1): 11–13.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jrssig/qmae007.
Berger, J. 2008.
Ways of Seeing. Penguin Modern Classics. Penguin Books Limited.
https://books.google.de/books?id=QxdperNq5R8C.
Berne, E. 2011.
Games People Play: The Basic Handbook of Transactional Analysis. Tantor Media, Incorporated.
https://books.google.de/books?id=D9dOBAAAQBAJ.
Bilz, S., R. Klanten, and M. Mischler. 2011.
The Little Know-It-All: Common Sense for Designers. Gestalten.
https://books.google.de/books?id=JA8FfAEACAAJ.
Bjork, Robert A, and Elizabeth L Bjork. 2011. “Making Things Hard on Yourself, but in a Good Way: Creating Desirable Difficulties to Enhance Learning.” In Psychology and the Real World: Essays Illustrating Fundamental Contributions to Society, edited by Morton A Gernsbacher, Robert W Pew, Leah M Hough, and James R Pomerantz, 56–64. Worth Publishers.
Bloom, P. 2016.
Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion. HarperCollins.
https://books.google.de/books?id=op67CwAAQBAJ.
Bringhurst, R. 2004.
The Elements of Typographic Style. Elements of Typographic Style. Hartley & Marks, Publishers.
https://books.google.de/books?id=940sAAAAYAAJ.
Briscoe, M. H. 2012.
Preparing Scientific Illustrations: A Guide to Better Posters, Presentations, and Publications. Springer New York.
https://books.google.de/books?id=mYTlBwAAQBAJ.
Cepeda, Nicholas J, Harold Pashler, Edward Vul, John T Wixted, and Doug Rohrer. 2006. “Distributed Practice in Verbal Recall Tasks: A Review and Quantitative Synthesis.” Psychological Bulletin 132 (3): 354–80.
Chasson, Gregory, and Sara R. Jarosiewicz. 2014.
“Social Competence Impairments in Autism Spectrum Disorders.” In
Comprehensive Guide to Autism, edited by Vinood B. Patel, Victor R. Preedy, and Colin R. Martin, 1099–1118. New York, NY: Springer New York.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4788-7_60.
Cheeseman, Ian H., Natalia Gomez-Escobar, Celine K. Carret, Alasdair Ivens, Lindsay B. Stewart, Kevin KA Tetteh, and David J. Conway. 2009.
“Gene Copy Number Variation Throughout the Plasmodium Falciparum Genome.” BMC Genomics 10 (1): 353.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-353.
Cherry, C. 1980.
On Human Communication: A Review, a Survey, and a Criticism. MIT Press Classics. MIT Press.
https://books.google.de/books?id=kQwqSwAACAAJ.
Daston, L., and P. Galison. 2007. Objectivity. Book Collections on Project MUSE. Zone Books.
Diemand-Yauman, Connor, Daniel M Oppenheimer, and Erikka B Vaughan. 2011. “Fortune Favors the Bold (and the Italicized): Effects of Disfluency on Educational Outcomes.” Cognition.
Hamming, R., and B. Victor. 2020. The Art of Doing Science and Engineering: Learning to Learn. Stripe Matter Incorporated.
Hench, Virginia K., and Lishan Su. 2011.
“Regulation of IL-2 Gene Expression by Siva and FOXP3 in Human t Cells.” BMC Immunology 12 (1): 54.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2172-12-54.
Hill, Jennifer, and Maria Singer. 2014.
“A Comparison of Print and Digital Reading Comprehension by Middle School Students.” Reading Research Quarterly 49 (2): 185–203.
https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.68.
Hofmann, A. H. 2020.
Scientific Writing and Communication: Papers, Proposals, and Presentations. Oxford University Press.
https://books.google.de/books?id=vQXuxAEACAAJ.
Jeffares, A. N., and M. B. Davies. 1958.
The Scientific Background: A Prose Anthology. Pitman.
https://books.google.de/books?id=F_gLAQAAIAAJ.
Kahneman, D. 2011.
Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus; Giroux.
https://books.google.com.ec/books?id=ZuKTvERuPG8C.
Lupton, E. 2010.
Thinking with Type, 2nd Revised and Expanded Edition: A Critical Guide for Designers, Writers, Editors, & Students. Princeton Architectural Press.
https://books.google.de/books?id=Y_NVRQAACAAJ.
Mangen, Anne, and Don Kuiken. 2014.
“Lost in an iPad: Narrative Engagement on Paper and Tablet.” Scientific Study of Literature 4 (2): 150–77.
https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.4.2.01man.
Mangen, Anne, Bente R Walgermo, and Kolbjørn Brønnick. 2013.
“Reading Linear Texts on Paper Versus Computer Screen: Effects on Reading Comprehension.” International Journal of Educational Research 58: 61–68.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.002.
Margolin, Sara J, Christine Driscoll, Michael J Toland, and Jessica L Kegler. 2013.
“E-Readers, Computer Screens, or Paper: Does Reading Comprehension Change Across Media Platforms?” Applied Cognitive Psychology 27 (4): 512–19.
https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2930.
Murayama, Hiroshi, Yusuke Takagi, Hirokazu Tsuda, and Yuri Kato. 2023.
“Applying Nudge to Public Health Policy: Practical Examples and Tips for Designing Nudge Interventions.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. MDPI.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20053962.
producer, Stephen Lambert ;. written executive, and produced by Adam Curtis ;. RDF Television; BBC. [2009?].
“The Century of the Self.” Standard format. Wyandotte, MI : BigD Productions, [2009?].
https://search.library.wisc.edu/catalog/9910135083802121.
Roediger, Henry L, and Jeffrey D Karpicke. 2006. “Test-Enhanced Learning: Taking Memory Tests Improves Long-Term Retention.” Psychological Science 17 (3): 249–55.
Rohrer, Doug, and Kelli Taylor. 2007. “The Shuffling of Mathematics Problems Improves Learning.” Instructional Science 35 (6): 481–98.
Roman, K., and J. Raphaelson. 2010.
Writing That Works, 3rd Edition: How to Communicate Effectively in Business. HarperCollins.
https://books.google.de/books?id=3Rcv5CmGYf0C.
Roßa, N. 2017. Sketchnotes: Visuelle Notizen für Alles. frechverlag.
———. 2020. Sketchnotes: Die Große Symbol-Bibliothek. frechverlag.
Rousselet, Guillaume A, John J Foxe, and J Paul Bolam. 2016. “A Few Simple Steps to Improve the Description of Group Results in Neuroscience.” Eur. J. Neurosci. 44 (9): 2647–51.
Sanges, Remo, Yavor Hadzhiev, Marion Gueroult-Bellone, Agnes Roure, Marco Ferg, Nicola Meola, Gabriele Amore, et al. 2013.
“Highly conserved elements discovered in vertebrates are present in non-syntenic loci of tunicates, act as enhancers and can be transcribed during development.” Nucleic Acids Research 41 (6): 3600–3618.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt030.
Shannon, Claude Elwood. 1948.
“A Mathematical Theory of Communication.” The Bell System Technical Journal 27: 379–423.
http://plan9.bell-labs.com/cm/ms/what/shannonday/shannon1948.pdf.
Singer, Leona M, Patricia A Alexander, and Deborah D Reese. 2014.
“Reading on Paper and Digitally: What the Past Decades of Empirical Research Reveal.” Review of Educational Research 84 (4): 509–45.
https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314541101.
Slamecka, Norman J, and Peter Graf. 1978. “The Generation Effect: Delineation of a Phenomenon.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 4 (6): 592–604.
“Status of Mind - social media and young people’s mental health and wellbeing.” 2017. Royal Society for Public Health.
Steed, S., and an O’Reilly Media Company Safari. 2019.
Empathy at Work. O’Reilly Media.
https://books.google.de/books?id=U-j8xAEACAAJ.
Wästlund, Erik, Lars Nilsson, and Kenneth Holmqvist. 2012. “Eye Movement Patterns and Reading Processes in Eye-Friendly and Non-Eye-Friendly Typography.” Information Design Journal 19 (2): 119–32.
Weschler, L. 2006.
Everything That Rises: A Book of Convergences. McSweeney’s Books.
https://books.google.de/books?id=dqefAAAAMAAJ.
Zinsser, W. 2012.
On Writing Well, 30th Anniversary Edition: An Informal Guide to Writing Nonfiction. HarperCollins.
https://books.google.de/books?id=mp16BDRDaYQC.